Learning from North Point, part 9

(Picking up from an old series)

North Point’s fifth “Principle for Effective Ministry” is “Listen to Outsiders.” Pretty strange idea, isn’t it? After all, what can we expect outsiders to know? If we want to know what to do as a church and how to do it, we need to listen to the experts, the people who have been there all their lives.

But North Point has the audacious idea that their primary reason for existence is not to take care of insiders and keep them happy. Rather, their goal is to create environments where outsiders can come to faith in Jesus. They reason that if all their language is purely the language of insiders, the outsiders will not be able to follow along- if they even bother to show up.

By “listen to outsiders” they don’t mean “water down the Gospel to make it easier to swallow.” If they perceive in the culture of those they’re trying to reach a commitment to a vague spirituality (whether what Christian Smith calls “Moral Therapeutic Deism” or some variant of the Americanized Buddhism so common today), they’re not thinking about tossing Jesus out the window. “You know, outsiders really want vagueness. Tolerance is the thing. Different strokes for different folks.” Though some might interpret “listen to outsiders” as entailing a change in basic theological commitments, Andy Stanley and crew have nothing like that in mind.

Of course, that’s part of the problem of focusing so much on methods. While it would be surprising to find a book called 7 Practices of Effective Ministry that didn’t focus on method, methodology is not as neutral as we would like. If we just take the 7 Practices, we could lay them on top of just about any organization, religious or not. North Point, though not officially a Southern Baptist church, comes with the basic theology and ethos of that ecclesial tradition. Adapting their practices in an institution like the United Methodist Church – or in a single United Methodist congregation – would be more difficult because of our tendency to lack a shared doctrinal vision. We have folks in our pews who are convinced that we need to “listen to outsiders” and that doing so would leads us away from our narrowness of talking only about Jesus.

In Good to Great Jim Collins describes how the successful companies he studied were ruthlessly narrow-minded when it came to their core purpose and completely flexible when it came to the methods of fulfilling their purpose. Though I don’t recall Andy Stanley mentioning Collins in reference to this, the contexts certainly match. Our traditional UM churches, however, tend to go the other way around. We are ruthlessly narrow-minded when it comes to our methods (we’re Methodists) and completely flexible when it comes to our core purpose. While we have made some progress of late, I think of our official mission statement – to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world – we still have a way to go when it comes to gaining a shared understanding of what we mean by “disciple.”

Since most of our churches are institutionally conservative, i.e., focused on doing what we’ve always done, and oriented around taking care of our current members, we can learn from North Point. One of the texts Stanley uses in his exposition is Jesus’ story of the shepherd who left the ninety nine sheep to find the one that was lost. Is it possible that in listening to outsiders and making moves to draw them in, make them comfortable enough to stick around and hear the Gospel, that we might lose some insiders who are unhappy we’re no longer catering to them? Sure. In fact, if we consider previous movements that were effective in reaching people (whether we think of Jesus, John Wesley, or others more contemporary), they always did things that made some insider decide to go another direction. If we are truly reaching people for Jesus, we won’t keep everyone. It’ll be hard, since some – if not most – of those who decide to go another way will be people we count as our friends.

North Point calls their evangelism strategy “Invest and Invite.” Ordinary church folks invest in the lives of friends, neighbors, family, and co-workers, and then invite them to one of North Point’s environments. Two things happen through this approach. First, outsiders are exposed to the Gospel – as lived out by church folks, and as articulated in the environments they visit. Second, those who are investing and inviting are sensitized to the questions and culture of their friends who are outsiders. Because they have listened to outsiders they know that churches have to do more than just engage in insider lingo to communicate with them.

One of the downsides of pastoring a traditional church is that I have plenty to keep me busy just spending time with church folks, limiting my exposure to outsiders. One reason I stay plugged in to Facebook is that it is a great way to stay in touch with outsiders. In our community even most of the outsiders I’m around are only outsiders from my congregation, not from the Christian faith. I’m not out to empty all the other churches by bringing their people to my church. In this kind of setting non-professional Christians can be much more effective in listening to outsiders.

I’m sensitive to outsiders on Sunday morning (“Sunday morning worship” is our main environment attended by outsiders). I want them to be able to grasp what we’re doing and saying. But here’s a twist. I also agree with Francis Chan when he says, “Something is wrong when our lives make sense to unbelievers.” So what is it – do we make sense or not? Yes! We need to be clear enough in our communication that people can understand that they don’t understand – that the logic of following Jesus is profoundly different than the logic of the world. We gain the ability to help people clearly fail to understand by listening to them. And this realization of not understanding is a preliminary to true understanding.

Posted in church growth, Evangelism, North Point Church, Spirituality | 2 Comments

Rural Church

One of the books I’m reading now is Shannon O’Dell’s Transforming Church in Rural America. I figured that since I’m pastoring a church in rural America (ok, some folks describe our town as a metropolis – when compared to surrounding towns [take “town” very loosely] like Leesburg, Ebenezer & Pine) I ought to read this book.

Early on, O’Dell mentions what he calls the “Four Most Difficult Decisions for a Rural Pastor.” These are:

  1. To pastor in rural America… with low incomes, low resources, and low expectations.
  2. To reach the lost and unchurched. (Most people say they want to reach the lost… until they do and their church starts changing.
  3. To equip the church with accurate and healthy structure… changing bylaws, constitutions, and church policy as necessary.
  4. To remove “Holy Cows” to be more effective… such as pews, property, and people.

Of course, the first of these is not really relevant to my situation. It was not my “choice” that brought to rural America. It was the Cabinet’s choice. They said, “You are going,” so I went.

I am familiar with the difference between the small town rural realities and the bigger city realities. I’ve lived enough places in my life that I’m pretty flexible. Sure would be nice to have more resources, though. I think that – then I remember something Craig Groeschel said (I think it was Craig). He observed that creativity is driven by a lack of resources connected with a great vision. The block to this creativity tends to come from O’Dell’s #4. We’re a 150+ year old church. The place is teeming with cows. We’re not always sure what to do with creativity (unless it helps us do what we’ve always done).

Our county is full of sinners. While some of those sinners fill our churches, plenty more currently lack a real connection to a church. When we finally manage to bring in some non-church folks, helping them get past our oddness, we then need to make disciples of them. Unfortunately, the UMC has been more into making members than disciples for the past couple of generations. The denomination as a whole has shifted over to “disciple” language, but many local churches just figure that’s a new word for what they’ve always meant by “member.” Very few of us, whether old-timers or new-comers are really open to discipleship. We might just have to change our ways!

As to changing structures and systems… We could use more of that. Our leadership structures are mostly ok, but our discipleship structures are what they are because that’s what they’ve always been. If you don’t become a disciple by attending Sunday morning worship and a Sunday school class, well, there must be something wrong with you.

Holy Cows. I’ve already noted that we have plenty of them. It’s great to have a beautiful hundred year old sanctuary. But it can be crippling to ministry to have a hundred year old building (and a few other old buildings) that suck hundreds of thousands of dollars for upkeep. While a few seem to worship the historic sanctuary with its historic pipe organ and historic stained glass windows, I think those particular cows are less of an impediment than the lack of effective structures for discipleship.

We have a lot to learn.

Posted in Local church | 1 Comment

Avoiding Fame

Have you read the Miley Cyrus quote in the recent Christianity Today:

“My faith is very important to me. But I don’t necessarily define my faith by going to church every Sunday. Because now when I go to church, I feel like it’s a show.”

Perhaps you’re thinking something like, “Church sure has come a long way in the past generation. In the old days we’d go to church, sit quietly in our pews, listen to the organ music, stand up for the hymns, listen to a sermon, shake some hands, and then go home. Now they have stages, bands, lights and fancy electronics. It’s just a show.” That would certainly be one possible contextualization of the quote. If we want to get young folks like Miley Cyrus in our churches, so we would then reason, we need to get rid of the show, and get back to the basics. We need simple traditional worship, instead of the Show.

But in the original context (thanks to my wife for pointing this out), immediately after the quote, she adds, “There are always cameras outside.” With this addition we see that the Show she’s speaking of is not inside the church, but outside. The problem here (might be elsewhere) is not that worship has become a show, but that her fame and the way fame works in our culture ensure that there is a show wherever she goes in public. If I were the pastor of her church I would see this is a problem also: How do we engage in worship of Jesus  when someone with so much more star power, by our reckoning at least, is in our midst, someone who generates more obvious adoration?

One solution is to stop acting on the fame of the people around us. If we become hardened, apathetic or indifferent to the fame of others, we might find ourselves in a place where we can worship and adore Jesus even if Miley  Cyrus (or President Obama or any other famous people) are present.

That solution, however, won’t be much help to Miley Cyrus, at least not in the short term. Some few folks might succeed in turning from the allure of fame, but surely such a move will be a stretch for the multitudes, especially for those who enjoy it so much. The other solution would be for Miley Cyrus and others to avoid the affliction of fame on their side. Given our way of doing things, sounds pretty unlikely, doesn’t it?

When we consider the benefits of fame – the adoring crowds, the plentiful money – why would anyone want to avoid fame? I can imagine that the Christian, the follower of Jesus, might want to avoid fame so she or he would not be isolated from life in the Body of Christ. If salvation is only going to heaven when we die (or, as some put it, “Pie in the Sky, by and by), then we can get by without the Body of Christ. But when we read the New Testament, we see that life together as worshipers, followers, and lovers of Jesus, able to stand each other because we’ve been reconciled through his blood, is part of  salvation itself. Church – taken as the life of the saints lived together here and now – is part of what the bible means by salvation. Therefore, when we have a fame system, we not only hurt the church by the possible substitution of idols for Jesus, but we also keep people away – or build fences to keep ourselves away.

Posted in Culture, Spirituality, Worship | Leave a comment

Getting to Philippians 4

Have you ever noticed what Paul said in Philippians 4? We find him saying things like:

  • Rejoice in the Lord always; Again, I say, rejoice!
  • I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me.
  • My God shall supply all your needs through his riches in glory in Christ Jesus.

Sounds pretty good, doesn’t it? Wouldn’t it be nice to be able to say those things in our own lives?

We have a couple of guys in our church who run marathons. I think it would be cool to run a marathon. I think I’ll do it next week. If you knew me, you’d think that’s laughable. Though I exercise each week, I haven’t run much at all in several years. No way I’d be able to run a marathon next week.

My daughter likes to watch medical shows on TV. Pretty cool how they help people with those surgeries. I think I’ll take up surgery next week. I’m sure the unanimous comment is, “Not on me!” Though I’ve done successful surgeries on electronics before, surgery on a living being – at least one that you want to remain living after the surgery – requires years of education and training. No way I could do that next week.

I like music. One of the pieces I’ve liked over the years is Mozart’s Piano Sonata in A. I first heard it years ago, in an arrangement for flute and guitar. I don’t remember who was playing the guitar, but I’m pretty sure Jean Pierre Rampal was playing the flute. No way I could play two instruments, so I’ll just aim to play it on piano next week. Again everyone who knows me laughs. While I can play a couple of songs “one finger” on the piano, and am well enough educated to know that pianos have 88 keys, I’ve never had a piano lesson in my life.

In each of these cases –  running a marathon, doing surgery, or playing beautiful music – discipline is required. In each case I must submit myself to a particular way of life before I will ever make progress. It’s the same way with Paul in Philippians 4. With our cherry picking propensity, we easily identify these verses in Philippians 4 as favorites. We memorize them (maybe), and let them cheer us up. And they can do that. But by ignoring their context, we miss their real power.

If we begin at chapter 1 of Philippians, we find Paul in prison. He doesn’t know whether he’ll live or die. The soldiers could come in at any time and say, “Let’s go Paul, time for your execution.”

Prison? Execution? Not my idea of a “Rejoice in the Lord always” environment. Not a situation in which I’d be thinking, “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me. “My God will supply all your needs through his riches in glory in Christ Jesus” would probably not be my first thought. Instead I might be thinking, “Get me out of here God! I’ve served you faithfully all these years, and here I am in jail – and it’s all your fault!”

And yet we see Paul saying things like, “Rejoice in the Lord, always!” What made the difference? It was Jesus. More than that, it was taking up the way of Jesus as the determinative pattern of his life. In Philippians 2 we see Paul looking at Jesus. Jesus did count count equality with God as something to be exploited, but made himself nothing, taking the nature of a servant, humbling himself even to the point of death on a cross.

In Philippians 3 we see that Paul has taken that story of Jesus and made it his own. A Hebrew of Hebrews. Of the tribe of Benjamin. A zealous Pharisee, so serious about his business, so dedicated to the way of God, that he took it upon himself to persecute the church. As to legalistic righteousness, faultless. But he didn’t settle for that. Instead, he counted all that as loss – as rubbish – that he might gain Christ and be found in him. He would depend on Christ’s righteousness, not his own. He sought conformation with Christ – even in his suffering, even in his death – so that he might also be conformed with him in his resurrection.

It was only by taking up the way of Jesus as his own way of life, that Paul was able to become the kind of person who was able to say what he said when he said it. If we want to be able to say, “I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me,” the only way is to become the kind of people who take up the way of Christ as our own.

Posted in Jesus, Paul, Spirituality | 1 Comment

Books I’m reading now

Having a short attention span, I tend to read several books at once. The ones I’m engaging in right now include these:

1. James Davison Hunter, To Change the World. I’ve just started it, so I don’t have much to say yet. It is a topic I’ve been thinking about for thirty years.

2. Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morality. Nietzsche is on a helpful track in his historical approach to morality. He seems to Hegelian, however, in looking for monolithic cultural forces to instigate change.

3. Richard Posner, A Failure of Capitalism. A book that is not directly related to any of my research projects, yet, hopefully, useful to my understanding of our times. Only through the first chapter – so far Posner is not optimistic about our situation.

4. Paul Ricoeur, Time and Narrative (v.1). A book (ok, the first volume of a series) that I should have read long ago. His discussion of Augustine’s understanding of time, particularly the relationship between past, present and future, is especially stimulating.

5. Martin Heidegger, Being and Time. Another slow read. I prefer Heidegger’s Being-in-the-world to the usual subject-object dichotomy of modernity – a big improvement. Wish he hadn’t gone Nazi.

6. Bible reading this week is focusing on Joshua, the book I’m reading with the guys, and Philippians, my primary text for next Sunday.

Posted in Books | 1 Comment

Reading Cavanaugh on the Invention of “Religion”

One of the books I’m working through now is William Cavanaugh’s The Myth of Religious Violence. If you’re open to a little heresy (not heresy directed toward Christianity, but toward religion-like phenomena like nationalism, capitalism, Marxism, etc.), check it out. His contention is not that it is never the case that a cultural phenomenon we’ve been trained to call “religion” (e.g., Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, etc.) resorts to or is complicit in violence. Rather, he is arguing that because the boundary lines between “religious” phenomena and “secular” phenomena are so arbitrary (and of recent Western vintage), they are of little use in ascribing greater tendencies toward violence in “religion” than in, say, “nationalism.”

Here’s a choice paragraph (p. 120-1):

“’The West,’ ‘modernity,’ ‘liberalism,’ and so on are not simply monolithic realities, but are ideals or projects that are always contestable. Part of the function of ideology, however, is to present these projects as based on essential realities that are simply there, part of the way things are. As we saw in Locke’s writings, the religious-secular distinction is presented as embedded in the immutable nature of things. In fact, however, this distinction was born with a new configuration of power and authority in the West and was subsequently exported to parts of the world colonized by Europeans. Within the West, religion was invented as a transhistorical and transcultural impulse embedded in the human heart, essentially distinct from the public business of government and economic life. To mix religion with public life was said to court fanaticism, sectarianism, and violence. The religious-secular divide thus facilitated the transfer in the modern era of the public loyalty of the citizen from Christendom to the emergent nation-state. Outside the West, the creation of religion and its secular twin accompanied the attempts of colonial powers and indigenous modernizing elites to marginalize certain aspects of non-Western cultures and create space for the smooth functioning of state and market interests.”

Here in the US our civil religion is very closely tied to our Christianity for all but a few baptist (“small ‘b’ baptist,” as James Wm. McClendon, Jr. would say.) sects and groups we usually consider way beyond the pale like the Jehovah’s Witnesses. Which kind of religion results in more deaths each year? Which inflicts more violence around the world?

Posted in Culture, Ecclesiology, Politics | 2 Comments

Thinking about our Church values

Craig Groeschel is thinking about and refining his church values. I find his comments worth listening to, so here they are, along with some comments of my own.

1)    We are faith-filled, big thinking, bet-the-farm risk takers. We’ll never insult God with small thinking and safe living.

Craig doesn’t tread lightly, does he? We’ve done a little of this here in Pittsburg – acquiring the property across the street comes to mind. But in many ways we do value playing things safe, both in our individual lives and in our life as a church. Part of our reluctance to risk might be that we’re so heavily invested in our status quo. We (families and the church) have buildings we love, use regularly (and still owe on). The church in Georgia that recently sold its building so it could have more money for ministry might as well be on another planet as far as we are concerned. We have children to raise. We thrive on continuity and predictability.

2)    We are all about the “capital C” Church! The local church is the hope of the world and we know we can accomplish infinitely more together than apart.

One of the good things about Pittsburg is the degree to which churches are willing to work together, to work as partners in ministry rather than competitors. When an arsonist torched our youth building several years ago another church in town took up an offering for us. That wouldn’t happen in every community I’ve lived in. We participate in each others events and have events in common. we’ve even crossed the Catholic/Protestant divide. Considering the demographics of our community there are plenty of people around who are unattached to any church for all our churches to grow without merely shuffling sheep. And maybe we’ll fulfill Jesus’ prayer in John 17 at the same time.

3)    We are spiritual contributors not spiritual consumers. The church does not exist for us. We are the church and we exist for the world.

With the current economic downturn – which hit our county especially hard, with our major industry/employer going through bankruptcy – there is a temptation to hold on to all we have with a death grip. But that is death. In the midst of challenges our people have remained generous and willing to meet the needs of people. I’m still convinced that generosity is healthy.

4)    We give up things we love for things we love even more. It’s an honor to sacrifice for Christ and His church.

What a good way to put it! We don’t just give up junk – the useless things lying around, the things we no longer value. We give up good things, things we enjoy and care about. We give them up for the sake of greater things. The tough part is taking the time to examine our values.

5)    We wholeheartedly reject the label mega-church. We are a micro-church with a mega-vision.

If anyone called us a mega-church, we’d have to think them sorely misguided. Surely they don’t know what they’re talking about. Our biggest crowd in my seven years here has been 378. We average just under 200. We have just over 400 members. While this is mega compared to one of the first churches I pastored (Bloomburg UMC – 10 people on Sunday), that’s what it’d be called. But that’s not what most people mean by mega. For us, then, we’d say something like, “We whole-heartedly reject the label small church.” First, we serve a mighty God who raised Jesus from the dead and gives us the Holy Spirit. We may be few in number in a town of small population in the 3rd smallest county in Texas, but our reach extends to the ends of the earth. Second, we still have some work to do on the micro end of things. We need more small groups where people can be intimately known, loved, discipled and equipped for ministry, places where people can speak and hear the truth in love.

Posted in Local church | Leave a comment

10 Books

Joining in the train that has been following Tyler Cowen, here are ten books that have shaped me to make me what I am today.

  1. The Bible – While I first encountered the Bible as a young child, only in high school did I start reading it on my own. As a follower of Jesus, I find it very valuable as I seek to know him, his purposes and his ways of acting in the world. I like John Wesley’s idea of being homo unius libri.
  2. The Lord of the Rings – This is another set I first read in high school. Though I was an extensive reader beforehand, somehow I didn’t even learn of Tolkein until my sophomore year. But then I read them again and again, to myself and to my little brother.
  3. The Journal of John Wesley – By the time I arrived at college, I knew I had a call to ministry in the United Methodist Church. Though I’d been a member of the church for years, I thought it would be a good idea to go to the source. I read Wesley’s Journal from beginning to end in my free time, finding a man seeking to know God and passionate to see others learn of Jesus and take up his way of life.
  4. Father Brown – The first Chesterton I read was Everlasting Man, but the works I keep going back to are the Father Brown Mysteries. The root of Father Brown’s insight that allows him to solve mysteries stems from his deep insight into sinners, knowing himself to be one of their number.
  5. After Virtue – I first saw Alasdair MacIntyre’s After Virtue at the Asbury Seminary bookstore, shortly before I graduated. Since I was about to return to Texas, I was trying to hold off on book buying, so I wasn’t able to read it until I started pastoring. By that time I was far from any sources other than Inter Library Loan. MacIntyre’s picture of the fragmented status of ethics in modernity struck me as eerily similar to the status of doctrine in my own denomination. Reading After Virtue wasn’t enough, so I went on to read most of his other works, the most important of which was likely Whose Justice? Which Rationality?
  6. Genesis of Doctrine – I remember struggling to justify paying the price Blackwell wanted for this book. The subject was already under my skin, so I had to get this book. It helped put some skin on the bones of my thinking begun by reading MacIntyre.
  7. Theology in an Age of Scientific Reasoning – I encountered Nancey Murphy’s book during my second semester of doctoral work, not surprisingly, when I was taking a course she taught on postmodernity. Nancey became the lead professor for the rest of my work and introduced me to the relevance of the philosophy of science.
  8. How to Do Things with Words – J.L.Austin’s little book has always struck me as a book many have picked up and few have finished. His notion of “performative utterance,” introduced in the first chapters has so captured people that they often fail to notice what he does with it by the end of the book. But in an age where so many are inclined toward anti-realism, it sounded like an easy way out.
  9. New Testament and the People of God – Though my main area of study was philosophical theology, I didn’t limit myself to that field. I think it as Colin Brown who suggested I read NTPG. I’ve read just about every book Wright has put out since then (I think I missed his Y2K volume, but not much more). His take on Jesus and the First Century world has deeply shaped my preaching and teaching. Along with others, I’m eagerly awaiting his next Big Book.
  10. Sources of the Self – Charles Taylor was another philosopher I discovered while in graduate school. Where MacIntyre writes as an insightful critic of modernity, Taylor writes as an insightful acquaintance, neither friend nor foe. Beyond Sources of the Self, many of Taylor’s papers and other books have shaped my thinking also.
Posted in Books | 1 Comment

When Things Go Wrong

Some people are optimists. They’re the folks who always expect good thing to happen. They see a silver lining in even the darkest days.

Some people are pessimists. Like Eeyore, Winnie the Pooh’s friend, they expect disaster right around the corner. However good things are right now, they’re sure it won’t last. Reality is about to jump out and bite them. Pessimists often deny the term, preferring to call themselves “realists.” Ron Heifetz describes this as a strategy of protecting oneself from any disappointment.

Have you ever been disappointed? I bet some of you are going through disappointments – even major ones – right now. You expected things, sometimes events, maybe your life as a whole, to turn out one way, but that way has never happened. Or if it did, what you expected to be good has been anything but.

Jesus’ disciples expected the best from Jesus. They’d heard his teaching. They’d seen his miracles. They’d seen him win encounter after encounter with the Pharisees and Sadduccees. They knew he was the one who would redeem Israel.

But then disaster struck. He was arrested. Hey, that’s no problem. He escaped every other predicament he’d been in. He’ll make it out this time, too. What? He’s not escaped yet? He’s on trial? He’s been convicted? They’re going to crucify him? Jesus – the one we thought was the Messiah – is dead? How could it be? We know for sure what’s coming next. The police will be coming after us. They’ll track us down, torture us and kill us. That’s what they always do to the folks who try to stand up for God.

Perhaps you’ve noted that transition in expectations in the Gospels.

The disciples were right to recognize the days as dark. Hard to get much darker than a brutal death. They were right to not venture into the la-la land that said something like, “Well, Jesus is in a better place now. He was just too good for this world.” Such a trip to la-la land completely misses what God was up to. Jesus came into the world knowing full well that the days were dark. At his baptism this non-sinner took upon himself the sins of humanity, setting himself up to absorb their consequences. He’d told the disciples that death awaited him in Jerusalem. They just never got it.

But death wasn’t the end for Jesus. The forces of sin, death and hell didn’t get the last word with him. God got the last word with Jesus, and his word was Live!

Whether you reckon yourself an optimist, a pessimist, a realist – or whatever – God’s word to you is Live! We find that life today through faith in the crucified and risen Jesus. Live in him.

Posted in Jesus | Leave a comment

Thanks! – Children

https://banditsnomore.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/dsc00578.jpgI don’t remember ever giving any thought to having children while I was growing up. But when Christi and I got married there was no doubt that we planned to have children.

But which ones? There are so many models available these days, with new ones coming out every day!

Two of our children are out of high school now, and another will soon be there. I hope I’ve been good for my children. I know they’ve been good for me.

I think the main thing I’ve learned from my kids is to loosen up with my sense of humor. Their presence in the family has really opened my up. I’m sure I wouldn’t be half the pastor and teacher I am, were it not for my children. They’ve taught me many lessons in communication (unintentionally), though I’m afraid I embarrass them from time to time when we’re out in public. But I tell them that’s part of a parent’s job description.

My children are a great blessing to me. I pray that God will bless them, direct them in His ways, and employ them for Kingdom purposes from now and into Eternity.

Thanks, Kids!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment